“a man and a
woman make far better friendships than can exist between two of the same sex
/but then with the condition that they never have made or are to make love to each
other.” Lord
Byron
You see, I’ve
written a fair few rom-coms in my time. These are pretty formulaic, and there are two major plot tools I always fall back on. The first is the“meet-cute”
(situation where girl meets boy) and the other stalwart is the “platonic sleep”. For characterisation nothing is greater shorthand for "This Is A Man You Can Trust” than the
guy who sleeps with a woman (who we have established he does have romantic
interest in) and manages to get from dusk to dawn without body fluids being
exchanged. It's jolly entertaining coming up with situations whereby the protagonists must spend a night together where rising ardour must be contained as the timing is not yet right.
And
that is one of the reasons why I love writing fiction... anything is possible
in a world I make up. In real life one does not have the certainty of the
contents of another’s head. Only when writing have I (or any pensmith) the deep knowledge of
exactly how all the protagonists really feel and can cue up the action accordingly.
Quite
often when the platonic sleep occurs in real life, it is taken to mean “This man is not interested” and
said man finds his non-action has bought him a one way ticket to the friendship
zone. From which (–despite my and other folks works of fiction–) no man has
ever escaped.
I’ll
tell you for why: physical contact
breeds closeness, and exchanging vulnerabilities leads to emotional bonding...
any kindergarten child could have told you that. Think about it?: Is
there anything more physically close than sharing a bed with someone? Is there
any time when you are more vulnerable than when you are asleep? It’s hardly
likely then that if two people of the opposite genders
have survived this experience and still manage to come out the other side emotionally
at arms length from each other ... that their
relationship is going to be defined as anything other than platonic. As I often say in words for inferior to Lord Byron's:” if the
horizontal foxtrot is not occurring then friendship is”.
Or
at least that is the way most women take it.
It
is always news to the female that the male participant in the platonic sleepovers
was ever looking to be more than friends.
Thus, it’s not as rare as one would like that as friendships mature and
the rounds of weddings are replaced by the rounds of christenings that the male
platonic friend will mention to the female as she cradles his newborns head: “Oh I wouldn’t swap him/her for the world...
and just think if I didn’t shake off my obsessional crush on you, he/she would never
have been born”. Word to the wise: STOP DOING THAT! It’s a miracle that
said newborn doesn’t actually get dropped - such is the shock!
I’m
delighted that these men do get on with their lives and finally escape the Friend
Zone (which is beginning to appear to be little more than a holding pattern for the
infatuated/unrequited); however it is rather disheartening than platonic
sleepovers are read by the participants so differently.
I think the huge mistake here is that the male
participant has the idea in mind that what women want is a man who is “good
loyal and nice”. Popular culture (to which my fictional waffle also belongs) does
rather fan the flames of this myth. In the real world women are actually looking for confidence, humour
and looks. The sad fact is that good,
loyal and nice doesn’t spark flames. A guy who doesn’t want to be in the
friendship zone is looking to have a real physical relationship and will flirt,
touch, even kiss at the first best opportunity. Good, loyal and nice will sleepover
without any attempt of that stuff. So, from a woman’s perspective... if he isn’t
trying to make the physical happen... he isn’t interested in you that way... he’s
just a friend.
Of
course popular culture is a lie! In the real world the platonic sleepover has never been a precursor to romance, it's a precursor of confusion at
best. And yet platonic sleepovers are on the rise. Nature never allowed for this phenomenon. It is not possible for a female to share a
bed with a heterosexual male and for it to be entirely platonic. And certainly not
from the guy side – the poor sods!
I
do feel sorry for men sometimes. Damned if they do (Blergh!!!
what a creep! I was just being friendly
then the next minute he is trying to shove a tongue down my throat!) Damned if they don’t (OMG
I CANNOT believe he had feelings for me ALL THESE YEARS and didn’t tell me!).
As
a (somewhat minor) contributor to the fallacy that the platonic sleepover and
good, loyal, nice is on females shopping list, I feel obliged to set the record
straight:
Despite
what you see in rom-coms or read in books... a platonic sleepover is not the launch pad to a fulfilling relationship.
The
platonic sleepover is an intimacy between a man and a woman which has no
element of sex in it, but which is a facsimile of commune that leads participants
to feel connected.
Which
is plain English means.... fellas... she thinks of you as family...like a
brother.
And
if she was the sort of girl who could change her mind and look at her brother
in ‘that’ way.... ask yourself would you still
be interested?
***Blergh!!!***
The JaxWorld Blog can be followed on Twitter-
@JaxWorldBlog
Or you can join over 7000 fans of The JaxWorld Blog on Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/The.JaxWorld.Blog
Or you can join over 7000 fans of The JaxWorld Blog on Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/The.JaxWorld.Blog
If
you enjoyed this blog and you want to contact Jax or find out more about the
JaxWorld blog, pls log onto: http://thejaxworldblog.vpweb.co.uk/
Thanks for continuing to vote for JaxWorld as the Best Blog about Stuff and for ALL your support that has made this blog such a huge success.
Thanks for continuing to vote for JaxWorld as the Best Blog about Stuff and for ALL your support that has made this blog such a huge success.
Its hard for men as the big distinction between "friendship" and "relationship" is the way they touch. There are platonic ways to touch someone, and romantic ways, and the boundary is different for different people.But some women are very affectionate with their friends; the girl you're interested in might be all about cuddling with you, and think nothing more of it than friendliness, while you feel like you're getting mixed signals. Okay you got in the bed - but you are paralized!
ReplyDeleteNB
This reminded me of Just Friends with Ryan Reynolds:
ReplyDelete"The ‘friend zone’ is like the penalty box of dating, only you can never get out. Once a girl decides you’re her ‘friend,’ it’s game over. You’ve become a complete non-sexual entity in her eyes, like her brother, or a lamp.”
To be avoided (the friend zone not the film!)
MB